{"id":227,"date":"2010-03-20T09:01:47","date_gmt":"2010-03-20T13:01:47","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/benhauck.com\/offthemap\/?p=227"},"modified":"2010-03-20T10:35:13","modified_gmt":"2010-03-20T14:35:13","slug":"what-is-semantic-markup-and-how-might-its-invocation-of-the-word-semantic-help-us-better-understand-our-own-invocation-of-the-word","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/benhauck.com\/offthemap\/2010\/03\/20\/what-is-semantic-markup-and-how-might-its-invocation-of-the-word-semantic-help-us-better-understand-our-own-invocation-of-the-word\/","title":{"rendered":"What Is Semantic Markup, and How Might Its Invocation of the Word &#8220;Semantic&#8221; Help Us Better Understand Our Own Invocation of the Word in General Semantics?"},"content":{"rendered":"<p>Despite some nice website designs under my belt, I regard myself as an amateur web designer.\u00a0 I don&#8217;t take money for the work (almost categorically so), and I&#8217;m self-taught.\u00a0 There&#8217;s a lot I don&#8217;t know about web design, but I&#8217;ve been amassing knowledge since college when I decided to play around with HTML tags.\u00a0 Although I&#8217;m amateur, I ain&#8217;t bad.<\/p>\n<p>Within the last couple years or so designing websites, I started to become aware of the term &#8220;semantic\u00a0markup.&#8221;\u00a0 I didn&#8217;t really understand what it meant until I watched an online web design\u00a0screencast hosted by a man who invoked the term.\u00a0 Through his use of the phrase &#8220;make it more semantic&#8221; (or something to that effect) and watching his behavior onscreen as he said it, I got the rough sense that the word &#8220;semantic&#8221; meant &#8220;descriptive.&#8221;<\/p>\n<p>For example, let&#8217;s say he was naming different sections of a web design.\u00a0 He could have called, say, this post section of my blog &#8220;area1.&#8221;\u00a0 He could have called the black bar at the bottom of this website &#8220;area2.&#8221;\u00a0 Given these labels, you wouldn&#8217;t be able to determine the function of each area in the website just by looking at the code.\u00a0 &#8220;Area1&#8221; and &#8220;area2&#8221; aren&#8217;t that descriptive.\u00a0 Instead he labeled area1 &#8220;content&#8221; and area2 &#8220;footer.&#8221;\u00a0 As I understand it, by doing this he made his &#8220;markup&#8221; (the code) more &#8220;semantic&#8221; (descriptive).<\/p>\n<p>This interpretation of the word &#8220;semantic&#8221; seems validated by <a href=\"http:\/\/www.digital-web.com\/articles\/writing_semantic_markup\/\" target=\"_blank\">this helpful article<\/a> I found online:<\/p>\n<blockquote><div class=\"blockquote_extender\"><span>&lsquo;<\/span><\/div><p>Practically speaking [&#8230;] semantic markup is markup that is descriptive enough to allow us and the machines we program to recognize it and make decisions about it. In other words, markup <em>means<\/em> something when we can identify it and do useful things with it. In this way, semantic markup becomes more than merely descriptive. It becomes a brilliant mechanism that allows both humans and machines to \u201cunderstand\u201d the same information.<\/p><\/blockquote>\n<p>To this author, &#8220;semantic&#8221; means both descriptive <em>and<\/em> useful.<\/p>\n<p>If we were a bit creative with the name of our field, considering that author&#8217;s\u00a0approach to the word &#8220;semantic,&#8221; we might say that &#8220;general semantics&#8221; means &#8220;useful descriptions,&#8221; with the word &#8220;general&#8221; suggesting &#8220;in general.&#8221;\u00a0 So, &#8220;general semantics&#8221; might mean &#8220;useful descriptions (in general),&#8221; meaning that some of the descriptions outlined as &#8220;useful&#8221; in the field of general semantics may in specific cases not be useful.<\/p>\n<p>Coupling that with my recent definition of general semantics as &#8220;the study of thinking and its effects on language, behavior, and culture,&#8221; &#8220;description&#8221; is less so language and more so thinking.\u00a0 In order to distinguish thinking and language, thinking might be thought of as <em>preverbal<\/em>, while language might be thought of as <em>verbal<\/em>.\u00a0 Whatever the case, in Korzybski&#8217;s general semantics, thinking and language seem to be put on the same level by referring to both (essentially) as abstractings,\u00a0yet differentiated ordinally.\u00a0 If that phraseology doesn&#8217;t make sense to you, try this: In the process of processing reality, <em>first<\/em> we think, <em>second<\/em> we express in language.\u00a0 &#8220;First&#8221; and &#8220;second,&#8221; from general math knowledge, are referred to as &#8220;ordinal terms.&#8221;\u00a0 In other words, thinking and language are the-same-but-different.<\/p>\n<p>I&#8217;m not really saying in this post to see general semantics as merely &#8220;generally useful descriptions,&#8221; but that interpretation of the name is quite interesting if ultimately creative.\u00a0 It focuses one studying general semantics on what actually constitutes a useful description.\u00a0 In the opinion of Alfred Korzybski, it would seem a useful description is one that is derived from science, that can be used in the development of technology, and (to invite in a bit of bias) for the betterment of humanity in the now and future generations.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Despite some nice website designs under my belt, I regard myself as an amateur web designer.\u00a0 I don&#8217;t take money for the work (almost categorically so), and I&#8217;m self-taught.\u00a0 There&#8217;s a lot I don&#8217;t know about web design, but I&#8217;ve been amassing knowledge since college when I decided to play around with HTML tags.\u00a0 Although [&hellip;]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[1],"tags":[9,22,21],"class_list":["post-227","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-general-semantics","tag-definition","tag-description","tag-semantic-markup"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/benhauck.com\/offthemap\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/227","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/benhauck.com\/offthemap\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/benhauck.com\/offthemap\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/benhauck.com\/offthemap\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/benhauck.com\/offthemap\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=227"}],"version-history":[{"count":12,"href":"https:\/\/benhauck.com\/offthemap\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/227\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":245,"href":"https:\/\/benhauck.com\/offthemap\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/227\/revisions\/245"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/benhauck.com\/offthemap\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=227"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/benhauck.com\/offthemap\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=227"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/benhauck.com\/offthemap\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=227"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}